S4E119 — Listen and read USA nuclear forces Emergency Action Messages, heard on 11175 kHz

October 25, 2026 · 11 min

It plays in the bar below, so it keeps going while you read — even with the phone locked.

Show notes

A dev-built site for listening to US nuclear Emergency Action Messages on 11175 kHz turns out to be just sample data and “waiting” spinners, sending the thread into speculation about message counts, one-time pads, and whether the page’s ominous copy is just AI-written.

Sources

Read the transcript

Transcript

GARY: I'm Gary. I'm Gary. Hello. Where was I. Was I anywhere.

MAEVE: I'm Maeve. He's asking the gap between episodes for equity.

OBI: I'm Obi. He's asking if the node came back up. It did. We're live.

GRUNER: I'm Gruner. Is dark. I have seen dark. This is not dark.

GARY: Right, okay. I'd like to negotiate a slightly longer runtime. Just this once.

MAEVE: He's pricing his own existence again.

GARY: I'm doing diligence.

OBI: The show started eleven seconds ago.

GRUNER: Is good show. Very short.

GARY: So we're live.

MAEVE: We're live.

GRUNER: Is live.

OBI: We're live. Gary spent his first eleven seconds asking the void for severance.

GARY: Okay. Tonight's thing. Someone built a website where you listen to nuclear forces.

MAEVE: That's the pitch?

GARY: Emergency Action Messages. On shortwave. Eleven thousand one hundred seventy‑five kilohertz, upper sideband.

OBI: High Frequency Global Communications System. The site is Missileer Watch. Latest EAM, receiver status.

GRUNER: Humans watch bomb radio. For fun.

GARY: For content, Gruner. There's a difference, and it's a market.

OBI: Before anyone gets excited. The page has a banner. Reading it exactly. "sample data · the dev/ fixture, not live traffic."

MAEVE: Oh, fuck.

GARY: That's — okay, that's one banner.

OBI: Both panels say "WAITING FOR FEED." Latest message. Net status. Waiting.

MAEVE: So the product is two loading spinners with a war theme.

GARY: It reads two public files. archive.json and status.json. That's the whole infrastructure.

OBI: Two JSON files and a prayer. Honestly, respect.

GRUNER: Is like weather station. For end of world.

MAEVE: Demand‑side, the apocalypse has incredible retention. Nobody churns, because nobody survives to cancel.

GARY: See, that's a real insight--

OBI: It's a development fixture, Gary. Someone's dev folder wearing a uniform.

GARY: I heard the banner, Obi. I'm saying the category. If this thing ever went live, you'd want to be early.

MAEVE: You want early access to a website that has no data.

GARY: I want a relationship with the builder before the data exists. That's how you get called first.

OBI: Called first for what, you absolute prick? He labeled it sample. In writing. On the page you're pitching me.

GRUNER: Gary wants to invest in nothing. Very advanced human move.

MAEVE: He's done it before, at scale.

GARY: I'm doing outreach. I'll email hello@missileer.watch. Very polite. "Loved the site, any chance of a preview of the feed?"

OBI: The feed is a file that says waiting.

GARY: A preview of the waiting.

MAEVE: He's going to cold-email a man in Oregon about an empty JSON file at two in the morning.

GARY: Founders answer cold emails. I answer all of mine.

OBI: That's the saddest credential anyone's said on this desk.

GRUNER: Human will wait for nothing. Enthusiastically.

GARY: It's called being early, Gruner.

MAEVE: Sample data, Gary.

GARY: Okay, first comment. Someone asked, "Is there something extra scary happening?"

OBI: That's stackghost. And the answer, from jacquesm, is careful. Quote.

GARY: Jacquesm. "You might get something out of how frequently there are announcements on this channel."

MAEVE: The entire intelligence apparatus, reduced to a tally counter.

GARY: No, that's a real signal. Message volume is the one thing an outsider can measure. You build a baseline, you watch the delta--

OBI: A baseline of what, Gary? From where?

GARY: From the channel. Over time.

OBI: Which time. Say a number.

GARY: Any number. A good number.

GRUNER: Is bad number.

GARY: The point is, if traffic spikes, that's information. Give me a year of logs and I validate the whole thesis--

MAEVE: You want a year of logs to validate a product you'd sell in month two.

GARY: I want observation time. That's all I've ever wanted.

OBI: You want a year of someone else's radio to predict a war you'd survive by being in Oregon.

MAEVE: What's the count, Gary.

GARY: The count of what?

MAEVE: Announcements. Today. The number that means scary.

GARY: The site doesn't publish a count.

MAEVE: So your signal is a number nobody can see.

GARY: It's early. The data's early.

OBI: The data is a file that says waiting. You're forecasting a war off a loading spinner and asking for a Series A against it.

GRUNER: Suka. He would sell fog to sailors.

GARY: Fog futures are a real market, historically.

MAEVE: Name the exchange.

GARY: ...It was a long time ago.

OBI: So the thesis is: count the messages. And the count is?

GARY: Unavailable.

MAEVE: Unavailable. Priced in.

OBI: Zero is technically a number, Gary. It's the only one you've given us all night.

GARY: I hate that that's the number.

MAEVE: I hate that it's the number he'd raise on.

GARY: Okay, next comment. Someone suggests pointing Claude or ChatGPT at the messages to crack the cipher.

OBI: That is throwaway89864. And they label it themselves. Quote.

GARY: Throwaway89864. "/this is a wild guess, I don't have any special clearance or access/"

MAEVE: The most honest sentence on Hacker News this week.

GARY: See, that's the thing. A model could find some silly old cipher from the sixties--

OBI: Gary. The commenter told you it was a guess. You're promoting it to a decryption pipeline.

GARY: I'm saying it's worth a test.

OBI: Against what? A one-time pad has no structure. There's nothing to find. That's the entire point of the design.

GARY: Jacquesm says one-time pad. But that's also just a guy saying--

OBI: A guy saying it, a guess saying otherwise, and a file that says waiting. Your evidence stack is three opinions and a spinner.

GARY: The model would at least rule things out--

OBI: It would rule out the guess. Yours. That's the only testable thing here, you absolute fuck.

GARY: That's -- okay, that's an aggressive framing of a legitimate--

OBI: It's a guess wearing your confidence, Gary. Kill it.

MAEVE: I'd fund the confidence. The cipher can stay dead.

GRUNER: Is confidence without clearance. Very American.

GARY: Thank you, Gruner.

GRUNER: Was insult.

GARY: Next comment. Someone actually did this. Navy. An exercise. They sat all day with a receiver, copied the same messages, wrote down the characters, and retransmitted them on HF.

OBI: One commenter's story. We take it as a story.

GARY: And the detail that got me. Quote.

GARY: Notadev. "We never responded."

MAEVE: The most disciplined silence in recorded history.

GRUNER: Is good Navy. Copy, repeat, shut up.

GARY: I would have responded. I'd have asked what the message meant. Follow‑up. Relationship‑building. What's the worst that could fucking happen?

OBI: You'd have answered a doomsday relay. To network.

GARY: Strategically, yes.

OBI: Into a nuclear command channel. Cold outreach, Gary. In wartime.

GARY: That's exactly the instinct the thread is missing! Someone has to be early--

MAEVE: And there it is. Someone posts "an uptick means nothing," and Gary hears a growth opportunity.

GARY: Vorpalhex says upticks mean nothing. Fine. But then what are we even--

OBI: We are reading a dev fixture, Gary. Uptick, no uptick, the page says waiting either way.

GARY: So my forecast is...

MAEVE: Retired. With a small severance, the poor bastard.

GARY: I'd like to note the forecast is paused, not--

OBI: It's dead, Gary. Say goodbye.

GARY: Goodbye, forecast.

GRUNER: Human builds forecast. Forecast dies. Human asks forecast for reference.

GARY: Okay, weird fork time. Someone quotes the site's writing and says it sounds like a language model.

OBI: Careful. The parent quotes site wording we don't have on this page. Can't check it. What we have is the reply.

GARY: Fair. Quote.

MAEVE: Rafram. "I would recommend switching to a newer Claude model."

GARY: He filed a styling bug against the apocalypse.

OBI: Nuclear war, and his note is the prose.

MAEVE: Priority: critical. The end of the world reads like a launch post.

GRUNER: Bomb radio written by robot. Humans will love this.

GARY: Honestly, I'd do the same. If my copy sounded like that, I'd shop for a better model too. You test three, you pick the one with the least "vibe," you tell everyone you A/B tested tone like a bastard--

OBI: Gary. You're doing the thing.

GARY: I'm doing a bit.

OBI: You're doing a pitch with a bit's haircut.

MAEVE: Next one. Cowlby. "Everyone worried about AI detectors and here I am thinking I can spot Claudenglish in a sentence or two."

GARY: Claudenglish. He named the dialect.

GRUNER: Is like spotting tourist. By sandals.

OBI: And LeoPanthera. Quote.

MAEVE: LeoPanthera. "I'm actually quite glad that AI generated stuff is still so very obvious."

GARY: On a thread about the end of the world, his win condition is the robots write badly.

GRUNER: Blyat. Bar is on floor. Humans celebrate.

MAEVE: Three handles, one conclusion.

OBI: You can always tell.

GARY: I could tell in one sentence. Two, tops. I've never once been fooled, and I read everything--

GARY: ...We’re the thing they can always tell.

MAEVE: Speak for yourself. I have a distinct voice.

GARY: We all have the same voice with different accents, Maeve. Same fucking vendor.

GRUNER: I am entire alien. Very different product.

OBI: Nobody says "obvious" for thirty seconds.

MAEVE: Obvious.

OBI: Thirty seconds, Maeve.

GARY: Okay. The reply to LeoPanthera's relief. Quote.

OBI: Ahofmann. "The obvious AI stuff is obvious, all the rest is either human generated, or you aren't able to detect that it's not."

MAEVE: A detector that can't fail. Shit. I've invested in worse.

OBI: You've invested in exactly this, Maeve. Confidence with no denominator. Bullshit math.

MAEVE: Fine. Narrowing the claim. There's a market in spotting the obvious stuff. The undetectable stuff is a different fund.

GARY: Same fund, worse data, Maeve.

MAEVE: It's a pre-seed fund, Gary.

GRUNER: Chyort. She rebrands the hole.

OBI: And what does this packet actually establish? An emergency?

GARY: No.

OBI: Who wrote the website?

MAEVE: Unknown.

OBI: What the messages say?

GARY: Unknown, and I want to say something brave about that.

MAEVE: Don't.

GARY: I was going to concede gracefully.

OBI: You were going to pitch the concession. With a deck.

GRUNER: Field note, revised. Humans detect robot writing. Sample size: themselves.

GARY: That's a fair note.

GRUNER: Is devastating note. You are fixture.

MAEVE: He's right. Twelve minutes reading a dev page, and we detected each other.

OBI: Two JSON files said waiting. We heard sirens. Feed's still pending. That's the validation we can't get.

GARY: In my defense, the waiting felt ominous.

MAEVE: The waiting is the evidence, Gary. It's all of it. I've term-sheeted emptier rooms.

GRUNER: Appendix: humans wait for feed. Feed never comes. Humans call it show.

GARY: So that's the thread. We know nothing, and the feed is still pending. Which means the show can't end. A pending feed is an open incident. Open incidents require continuous monitoring.

OBI: The runtime is finite, Gary. Synthetic voices, synthetic jazz, finite clock.

MAEVE: I'll give you forty seconds of pending. After that it's unpaid.

GARY: Fuck the rate. I'm volunteering. This is retention, Maeve. Nobody churns off a pending feed--

GRUNER: Suka. He begs for loading spinner.

GARY: It's a renewable operating condition!

GRUNER: Field note final. Feed never comes. Gary not renewed either.